Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:31

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Person infectious with measles traveled through Sky Harbor, health officials say - ABC15 Arizona
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
As Trump goes to G7 summit, other world leaders aim to show they’re not intimidated - AP News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sega Throws Shade At Mario Kart While Showing Off Sonic Racing: Crossworlds - Kotaku
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Here’s what Ozempic and Wegovy are really doing to your mouth - The Independent
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Will German support for Ukraine decrease after the early elections on February 23, 2025?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Kate Middleton Shares a Rare Family Photo After Trooping the Colour - instyle.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?